Pattern authors
Draw an operating model shape you have actually run or seen, in the twelve cells.
- Which cells it loads, which it starves
- Two real examples, named
- The characteristic failure
Euler Center · Work Composition · Open call
Build this with us, from wherever you are.
Business Model Generation was co-created by 470 practitioners across 45 countries, and that was not a nice touch at the end. It was the distribution, the credibility, and the correction mechanism in one move. This is a multi-year project and it will be wrong in specific, findable ways without people who work somewhere we do not. The Scaffold taxonomy publishes its own weakest cluster; the same standard applies to everything here.
I / Three ways to contribute
Send one thing rather than an introduction
Ledger contributors
Submit an operating model failure, anonymized, attributed to a blank cell.
- What was blank when it broke
- What was believed to be solid
- What actually caught it, or did not
Tradition reviewers
Correct the cultural entries in public. This is the part most likely to be wrong when it is written from one country.
- Where the framing is imported
- What the local logic actually is
- What it is routinely mistaken for
II / What we promise in return
Named, licensed openly, paid when there is money to pay
01
Attribution, by name, permanently
Contributors are named on the entry, in the book, and on the site. Not a thanks page at the back.
02
Creative Commons, attribution and share-alike
The canvas, the patterns, the worksheets, and the gate stay free to use, teach, translate, and adapt. Including by people who compete with us. Anyone who publishes an adaptation keeps it open on the same terms, so nobody can fork the language and close it.
03
You keep your own work
Contributing does not assign us your IP. You license it in, and you can teach it anywhere, including commercially.
04
Facilitators get paid
When the licensed facilitator network opens, contributors are first in line and the revenue share is published rather than negotiated case by case.
05
Corrections published, not quietly fixed
When an entry is wrong and you show us, the correction runs with your name on it and the original stays visible.
06
Sources carry their strength
Every claim says who reported it and how strong that is. Where the only evidence is self-reported or venture-sourced, the entry says so rather than rounding it up.
Six promises, all in force from the first contribution. Hold us to any of them in public.Report a broken promise
III / Where the gaps are right now
Being specific about what is missing is more honest than a general call for collaborators, and easier to say yes to
Two patterns are drafts
The Capability Center and the Levered Solo are sketched from research, not written by anyone who has run one.
Wanted
practitioners inside a capability center, and founders of very small high-revenue teams
Every case is secondhand
All sixteen cases are reconstructed from reporting. Not one is a first-hand account, which is the only kind that really teaches.
Wanted
anonymized first-hand incidents, any industry
The cultural material is desk research
The traditions work is the freshest thing here and the most likely to be wrong when it is written from one country.
Wanted
reviewers working inside Japanese, Gulf, Korean, Nordic, and African contexts
Link targets are unverified
Sources carry publication and date but not yet verified URLs. A method about evidence should not ship without them, so it is listed as a gap rather than quietly omitted.
Wanted
someone who enjoys citation checking more than we do
The credential has no assessor cohort
The taxonomy and the test center exist. The people qualified to assess oversight competence do not, because nobody has defined the bar.
Wanted
assessors, psychometricians, regulated-industry reviewers
Nothing is translated
A method about cross-cultural operating logic that exists only in English is arguing against itself.
Wanted
translators, starting with Japanese, Arabic, Portuguese, and Korean
The whole application
Twelve cells. Seven shapes. Forty-nine entries. Come argue with any of them.
If you want in, the fastest route is to send one thing rather than an introduction: a pattern, a failure, or a correction. That is the whole application.
Send one thing