Board maturity models
These rubrics grade a board's command of reserved matters and risk appetite as levels of assessed Mastery, cite charters and decision logs as Evidence, clarify Authority over reserved matters, and require annual Learning reassessment.
Unknown, drawing on CMM and CMMI style capability frameworks, 1990s
The origin of the framework, as the directory records it. The mark grades the origin, not this page.
The directory entry this score was read from. Umbrex is a consultancy network; its summary is the reference, not a primary source.
Scored against the twelve cells, it loads four: Authority, Mastery, Evidence, and Learning. The other eight it leaves to you. Of Composition, Evidence, and Mastery, the three cells that go blank first when an agent enters a workflow, it loads Evidence and Mastery.
This is not a summary of the framework. Umbrex has one; the link under Sources goes there.
Which decisions may an agent make alone, and who is able to stop it?
Who is qualified to overrule the machine, and how would you prove it?
What would you show an auditor, and can the system produce it without being asked?
How does tacit judgment become reusable, and who owns the loop that has to close?