High-Performance Organization (HPO) frameworks
These maturity diagnostics grade an organization on strategy clarity, workforce capability, and continuous improvement, loading Strategy, Mastery, Learning, and evidence based scoring, but never say which task an agent could hold.
Multiple, including Andre de Waal, related to Denison, EFQM, and Baldrige, 2000s
The origin of the framework, as the directory records it. The mark grades the origin, not this page.
Umbrex, High-Performance Organization (HPO) frameworks
The directory entry this score was read from. Umbrex is a consultancy network; its summary is the reference, not a primary source.
Scored against the twelve cells, it loads four: Strategy, Mastery, Learning, and Evidence. The other eight it leaves to you. Of Composition, Evidence, and Mastery, the three cells that go blank first when an agent enters a workflow, it loads Evidence and Mastery.
This is not a summary of the framework. Umbrex has one; the link under Sources goes there.
Where on the evolution curve does each capability sit, and does that dictate build, buy, or let go?
Who is qualified to overrule the machine, and how would you prove it?
How does tacit judgment become reusable, and who owns the loop that has to close?
What would you show an auditor, and can the system produce it without being asked?