Holacracy
The constitution distributes authority into roles and circles and prescribes governance and tactical meetings that continuously revise structure, but it leaves incentive and reward design largely unspecified.
Brian Robertson (HolacracyOne), 2007
The origin of the framework, as the directory records it. The mark grades the origin, not this page.
The directory entry this score was read from. Umbrex is a consultancy network; its summary is the reference, not a primary source.
Scored against the twelve cells, it loads four: Authority, Structure, Coordination, and Learning. The other eight it leaves to you. None of Composition, Evidence, or Mastery is among them, which is the usual result in this directory: the questions an agent in the loop raises first are the ones the literature answers least.
The library already carries it as Holacracy, and that entry holds the full sources and the cells in detail.
This is not a summary of the framework. Umbrex has one; the link under Sources goes there.
Which decisions may an agent make alone, and who is able to stop it?
What is the smallest unit that can own a customer outcome end to end?
What synchronizes the work when there is no room and half the team is not a person?
How does tacit judgment become reusable, and who owns the loop that has to close?