McKinsey performance contracts / performance-dialogue model
Named metric owners sign contracts and defend results in tiered dialogues, which fixes Authority and Coordination, while dashboards and quarterly reallocation add Evidence and a Learning loop, all without touching who performs tasks.
McKinsey & Company, 1990s
The origin of the framework, as the directory records it. The mark grades the origin, not this page.
Umbrex, McKinsey performance contracts / performance-dialogue model
The directory entry this score was read from. Umbrex is a consultancy network; its summary is the reference, not a primary source.
Scored against the twelve cells, it loads four: Authority, Coordination, Evidence, and Learning. The other eight it leaves to you. Of Composition, Evidence, and Mastery, the three cells that go blank first when an agent enters a workflow, it loads Evidence.
This is not a summary of the framework. Umbrex has one; the link under Sources goes there.
Which decisions may an agent make alone, and who is able to stop it?
What synchronizes the work when there is no room and half the team is not a person?
What would you show an auditor, and can the system produce it without being asked?
How does tacit judgment become reusable, and who owns the loop that has to close?